Contents

Talk:Knightmare Chess

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chess Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Board and table games Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A stub? How much do you want?[edit]

1. I'm considering dropping the stub tag. There is more that can be said, but how much detail is really appropriate? I don't want to step on SJG's propietary rights?
2. Specifically, would it be too much to list the different cards used? It seems to me that listing the cards & describing what they do could be a copyright violation.

Ventifax 23:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think the stub-tag can already be dropped. Just add whatever you think is appropriate, but I really think listing all cards with their descriptions would be too much. With the 160 cards there would be way too much too detailed information. I think it would get reverted with a reference to WP:NOT#IINFO. The copyvio point is probably also true, after all, you'd effectively just copy the whole work. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 16:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that description of all the cards is not necessary, but you're both wrong as a matter of law. The rules of a game are outside the scope of copyright (at least in the US, which is what matters for English Wikipedia). Copying from a rulebook without permission would be verboten because the rule book is an expressive work that is subject to copyright. Stating the rules of a game in your own words is permitted because rules are abstract ideas and not expressive works. Many people are confused about this issue because they fail to distinguish between copyright and patent (this due in part to the unfortunate term "intellectual property" which is often used to conflate inherently dissimilar legal domains). Deranged bulbasaur 06:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be willing to list card names for KC124.207.58.166 (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is needed. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 22:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Knightmare Chess 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knightmare Chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040110034117/http://www.gamereport.com/tgr14/knightmarechess.htmltohttp://www.gamereport.com/tgr14/knightmarechess.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]