Contents

Talk:Kola Superdeep Borehole

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 24, 2011, May 24, 2015, May 24, 2017, May 24, 2018, and May 24, 2020.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:Kola Superdeep Borehole is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Technology & engineering / Science & education High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.

We should at least mention the KTB borehole in Windischeschenbach, Germany that reached 9101 m. http://www.icdp-online.org/contenido/icdp/front_content.php?idcat=946 http://www.icdp-online.org/contenido/icdp/front_content.php?idcat=708

Why isn't the picture of the hole itself shown? What the heck? The actual picture is epic. don't know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:CEA6:601:30EA:BFE7:EE2D:DFC9 (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"a 5,000-millimetre (200 in) section". Really? Why use millimetres? I guess it was not accurate to 1 mm. And even if it was, why not 5.000 m? Sclaes (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I'll change it to 5 m (16 feet). (5 m is 196.85 inches or 16.404 feet so whoever wrote 200 inches clearly isn't too concerned about precision.) Vaughan Pratt (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm noticing many facts being erased from Wikipedia and I'm wondering why. They all happen to be things that basically prove the Big Bang theory wrong that I bring up in my writings. Who is doing that? Someone who wants to make the worthless, magical, lawbreaking Lambda-CDM theory to live forever? Edwin Hubbles page was altered and this page was altered because the hole ended up being much hotter than expected. Where did that fact go? There are many other examples of this unscientific process going on on this website as well.

Whatever it takes to keep our universe "created" like Genesis states, right? 173.95.132.165 (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is neutral. 104.187.66.104 (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]