Contents

Talk:Konstantin Mereschkowski

Konstantin Mereschkowski has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 30, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany. Algae Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fungi: Lichens Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Low-importance). Evolutionary biology This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Konstantin Mereschkowski/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another! Many thanks again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "his Russian work" is Russian needed here?
  • Cut.

• No reason for those two references in the lead, they can go into the main body if they're not already there.
  • Moved.

• " a Privy Councillor" is there a reason this is capitalised?
  • l/c.

• "famous scientists, publishing on anthropology" who was doing the **

publishing here, it's not clear.

• • Edited.

• "to the paedophilia for" do you mean criminal acts of paedophilia?
  • Edited.

• "classification of the diatoms based " overlinked.
  • Fixed.

• "University, Tatarstan;" I would think that Tatarstan should go after the first mention of Kazan, not here.
  • Done.

• " St. Petersburg" Saint Petersburg for consistency.
  • Fixed.

• "strikingly" according to whom?
  • Glossed.

• "to form chloroplasts.[14][12]" overlinked and ref order.
  • Fixed.

• "sizeable lichen herbarium, containing" lichen overlinked.
  • Fixed.

• "remains at Kazan University. It " overlinked.
  • Fixed.

• "a mutualistic symbiosis between" overlinked.
  • Fixed.

• "and indeed ridiculed" even rather than indeed.
  • Fixed.

• JSTOR is in both italics and not italics in the refs.
  • Fixed.

• Schimper is mentioned in the infobox but not in the article at all.
  • Added mention.

• Likewise Wallin.
  • Added.

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]