Kosovo Force is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
I removed the sentence『KFOR’s presence remains crucial to guarantee security and stability in Kosovo as the diplomatic process led by the United Nations to define its future status moves forward.』because there can be no citation given. Whether or not it is crucial is a matter of opinion and speculation and so the sentence was removed as being an example of clear bias unless someone can turn it into 'and the UN general fred said "it is crucial etc."' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmare (talk • contribs) 23:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the content to this article has been taken from NATO offical site [1]. Shouldn't matter though, as they are very liberal with all media content. I guess that same is true for text, although I haven't found any notice about on the site. --Vikingstad 19:42, Mar 17, 2004 (UTC)
The above link, and almost all the links in the article, to the NATO web site were "broken" (page not found). I've tried to fix things up as best I could.
The second-last link under External references should probably be deleted. I included it as I feel more in the role of re-writer than censor, and the link (in a slightly different version) has been in the article since 15 March 2007. --RenniePet23:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cold War WikiProject and WikiProject Germany?[edit]
WikiProject Germany? Germany has next to nothing to do with Kosovo Force. It contributes 6,000 troops to the force, but you may as well use that as an excuse to make this part of the WikiProject Russia, Italy, etc.
The general rule about titles is that you should use the full title unless it is more usual to refer to it by its acronym. So in this case, should this article be located at the Kosovo Force?Enochlau04:41, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would tend to think that this is an instance of a term where the acronym is used more often than the full name. To be frank, this must be about the first time I see "Kosovo Force" written (and I have some interest in the question). Rama08:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Russia withdrew its troops in 2003 after KFOR refused to give them an own occupation zone. Dutch soldiers prevented them from entering their territories. You can delete this entry.
Derim Hunt
One should be able to reach the article also from the form "K-For" used by the BBC News. I am very old and don't know how to make the reference.Svato (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
concerning the number of soldiers, there are a series of strange edits here by an IP-adress. Especially if you look at countries like the Netherlands and Georgia. Need second opinion before I undo. Dorkules (talk) 09:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In August 2005, the North Atlantic Council decided to restructure KFOR, replacing the four existing multinational brigades with five task forces, to allow for greater flexibility with, for instance, the removal of restrictions on the cross-boundary movement of units based in different sectors of Kosovo. but map shows that there were 5 sectors/brigades already in 2002. And as far as I can remember, there were 5 sectors from very beginning. -- Bojan Talk 06:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In the beginning of November 2010, there will be only two battlegroups, East and West. Operations of North, South and Central will cease/merge. Many nations are withdrawing their troops completely, for example Finland, Sweden, Czech and Slovakia. Intention is that KFOR will have mobile battlegroups in a few camps, instead of lot of troops in many camps. After planned withdrawals, amount of toops is about to be halved from 10 000 soldiers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.239.207.91 (talk) 11:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One of the images on the right, which shows an emblem with the NATO symbol over the German flag on the background, is described as Ukrainian soldiers on foot, patrolling in a Kosovan village near Brezovica. I'm not sure what the correct description for that emblem is, or whether a usable image showing Ukrainian soldiers in Kosovo exists somewhere, but this should be corrected. LJ-38M (talk) 01:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on Kosovo Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have searched everywhere on the Internet for information about the participation of the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the KFOR mission, but I have not found any such information anywhere. Therefore, I am wondering whether to remove this country as there is no information about its participation in KFOR. KujKuń (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
