This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
There does not appear to be any third-party confirmation that "the [Hellenic Central] intelligence service created the National League of Greek students in Italy and established offices in major university cities". This is something that was described (anonymously) by a single somewhat biased source: it may or may not be true. Unless someone can provide us with a credible citation from an independent source that the National League of Greek Students was established by the Greek intelligence services, this allegation clearly fails the criterion of verifiability. Therefore, it is preferable to distance ourselves from the allegation by using the term "allegedly". 79.131.175.180 (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the fact that he drove a fiat 500 so important to the article that it requires a picture of one to be on the page? It is already mentioned that he drove it, fair enough, but the make and model of his car is not a defining aspect of his actions.
You could include a picture of street cleaners, as they were the first on the scene, and heard some of his final words - arguably a more important detail than the type of car he drove. There is certianly more emphasis placed on the cleaners than the car.
Also, remember the onus is on the contributing editor to justify the inclusion, not the removing editor. I don't disagree that it shows the type of car, but I do think that it's undue to the article. a_man_alone (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I replied below but I will repeat my argument here: This picture, although not of the original car, helps the reader visualise how Georgakis went to the square the historic night of his suicide. It helps the visual reconstruction of an important part of that night's events. I am not sure how removing this picture helps improve the encyclopedia but I will wait to see the arguments. I also think that your are misinterpreting WP:BURDEN. I don't think it applies to images. I will ask for an RFC if you insist on that. Dr.K.λogosπraxis16:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not an important part of the nights event. It just happened to be his mode of transport on that night. Moreover, it's not even his own specific mode of transport, but rather a generic picture of a car like his. Although the phrasing of the burden policy does focus on references, the principle applies to any changes made to an article. Including a photo of a car like his is trivia and clutter, hence removing it improves the article. a_man_alone (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring has erupted centred around the picture Kostas Georgakis drove to Mateoti Square the night of his death, a Fiat 500. This picture, although not of the original car, helps the reader visualise how Georgakis went to the square the historic night of his suicide. It helps the visual reconstruction of an important part of that night's events. I am not sure how removing this picture helps improve the encyclopedia but I will wait to see the arguments. Dr.K.λogosπraxis16:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
3O Response: Firstly I will point out that I think you're both editing in good faith and have presented reasonable arguments for and against. In this particular case I'm inclined to side with a_man_alone in that I don't think the specific vehicle of choice for Georgakis is salient to the article. If he'd ridden a particular model of pushbike we wouldn't be including a picture of it in the article. WP:IMAGE says 'images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic' (emphasis mine). While I agree that the car could be considered loosely relevant to the events, I don't believe it's integral enough to the person of Georgakis himself, nor of his suicide, to be considered 'significantly and directly related' to this article.
Hopefully this opinion helps with your dispute. I will check back periodically but if you need further input from me, please be sure to let me know on my talk page so I can reply here. If this ultimately doesn't help you resolve your dispute, you may need to make use of other dispute resolution processes such as an RFC. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you TechnoSymbiosis for taking the time to provide your opinion. I appreciate the good work you and the other editors at 3O are doing. Although I disagree, I take it that current consensus is against me and thus I will defer to it. It is also a rather minor matter and since I am busy I will not pursue this any further. Dr.K.λogosπraxis23:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Kostas Georgakis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
