Contents

Talk:Lady Chatterley's Lover

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lady Chatterley's Lover article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Freedom of speech Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Novels Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 2, 2011.

I've added {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}} to the top of this talk page, due to the article's discussion of censorship attempts throughout its history. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but where is the mention of the Netflix special? Generalist1 (talk) 12:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to see a reference for this: "In early October 2009, the federal institution of Australia Post banned the sale of this book in their stores and outlets claiming that books of this nature don't fit in with the "theme of their stores"." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.117.24.7 (talk) 03:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does this need a longer/more comprehensive plot summary other than the 'Plot Introduction'? Dweckie (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think he’s referencing, or referring to all of the sex scenes Generalist1 (talk) 12:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2nd april 2017 - I am Italian and I was comparing the italian version of the novel to the english version: I discovered that at the end of chapter 12 a big part is missing, in most of the english versions I found in the internet, even in the one published here in Wikipedia. The part which is missing is mentioning the words "cunt" and "fuck", I can read the italian translation (by Gian Luca Guerneri, ed. Guaradi, 1995), ^[1] and I saw the version by Easy Read Edition pag. 279 ^[2] but anyway we should know that the version published in Wikipedia is not complete, but it's censored. 151.36.26.213 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Alessandra[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lady Chatterley's Lover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C738937%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150314220758/http://www.groveatlantic.com/tohttp://www.groveatlantic.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lady Chatterley's Lover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518194308/http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/IndianPenalCode/S292.htmtohttp://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/IndianPenalCode/S292.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110417163825/http://www.bristol.ac.uk/is/library/collections/specialcollections/archives/penguin/chatterley.htmltohttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/is/library/collections/specialcollections/archives/penguin/chatterley.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spike Milligan wrote two different parodies of two different versions of Lawrence's book:

LADY CHATTERLEY’S LOVER - ACCORDING TO SPIKE MILLIGAN; Published by Michael Joseph 1994

D.H. LAWRENCE’S JOHN THOMAS AND LADY JANE ACCORDING TO SPIKE MILLIGAN; Published by Michael Joseph 1995

See the wikipedia page "John Thomas and Lady Jane" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Thomas_and_Lady_Jane — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agbneill (talk • contribs) 06:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Thomas and Lady Jane was not published in 1927

See the wikipedia page "John Thomas and Lady Jane" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Thomas_and_Lady_Jane — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agbneill (talk • contribs) 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]