Contents

Talk:Landguard Fort

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Fortifications / British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force British military history task force European military history task force

The original content of this article is from http://www.forts.org.uk/, posted by the author, John Bray. See Talk:Fort Charlotte for a confirmation.

A drawing:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11244842645/

©Geni (talk) 20:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landguard Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215023036/http://woodbridgesuffolk.info/Suffolk/LandguardFort.htmltohttp://woodbridgesuffolk.info/Suffolk/LandguardFort.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the History section, after the phrase “However the main uses …”, there are some items beginning with two dashes.

Were these supposed to be regular list items, do you think? Wprlh (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]