 | Spectroscopy C‑class (inactive) | ||||||
| |||||||
The link of "matrix effect" sends me to "Matrix Digital Rain," an unrelated entry. Please correct it; thanks.
Either we do have companies dealing in this business in the external link section or we don't. But indiscriminately deleting some and leaving randomly selected companies and papers is not ok. Obviously there are other groups like Winefordner's with the same academic reputation out there: Sabsabi, Noll, Bäuerle, Niemax, Panne, Mauchien etc.. and in most cases there are the associated spin-offs where links are justified.
admittedly I am new to the wiki-stuff and was a bit put off by the randomness of the validity of the external links. OTOH: IBM has a Wikipedia entry as well, so why not a short link to LIBS-companies? Anyway, I'll try to find more uni-departments and related institutions for the link-list. Also, I gave the double pulse part a general makeover and removed the irrelevant part about delay generators;
In the last paragraph of the "Design" section, the following portion needs clarifiaction:
"Spectrometer response is typically from 1100 nm (near infrared) to 170 nm (deep ultraviolet), the approximate response range of a CCD detector. All elements have emission lines within this wavelength range."
It is unclear to me, at least, whether this means that all of the emission lines from any element will fall in this wavelength range, or whether this simply means that all elements have at least some of their lines in this range. If I knew, I'd fix it myself.
209.173.109.5 (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, is the use of the word "temporal" at the end of the paragraph really necessary? It's not a very common word (at least in the southwestern United States), and it seems rather ambiguous here, especially as it links to Wikipedia's disambiguation of the word. Unless my interpretation is wrong, I think the phrase could just be "allowing timely resolution"; if my interpretation is wrong, then that just further justifies the modification of the phrase. 209.173.109.5 (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest deletion of the final short paragraph on the analysis of oysters as i) I doubt mesolithic food is what most people would understand from the title, and ii) singling out one study seems like an advertisment given there is now much published LIBS work 217.155.100.50 (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
