This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 October 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Damonmand.
Release date not confirmed for beta. No sources available, yet it was edited into this wikipedia page. Suggestion: remove the release section as there is no date yet. Umarnobbee13 (talk) 20:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, it's essentially a mobile/console version of the PC game with a subtitle, not a distinctly different entity. -- ferret (talk) 11:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It might be forked content now, but it has potential for expansion. The game appears to be a spin-off, not a port, in which case I would totally support merging. But as a spin-off, it will get separate reviews commenting on what has changed from the original game. This, in my opinion, qualifies it for its own article.ZXCVBNM (TALK)05:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like a case that merits WP:IAR considering that merging it would be unnecessary and pointless when it inevitably gets expanded later. It might be somewhat of a crystal ball but I think it's pretty predictable that it will get a lot of reception, being based on such a popular franchise.ZXCVBNM (TALK)15:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Largely reiterated content for a game that has not been released. If it warrants its own article when the game comes out, and there is consistent, reliably reported news, then we can reconsider. There's very little to justify it having its own article right now. Imaginestigers (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its a standalone game, not a port, merging it with the PC version makes no sense and also seems like people have removed those so called forked content. Panda619 (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Not sure how this one hasn't been reviewed yet, but it was a quick and simple review. Anyways, good work..
Done "Fully" is necessary; it indicates that Tencent became majority owners of Riot (having already owned some portion of the company that I can't remember). — ImaginesTigers (talk) 19:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wish to work to promote this article to GA. Is any editor interested in joining? In order to avoid editing conflicts, I suggest a division of topics with an approach similar to League of Legends. Gameplay - Development and Reception, at least for now. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was planning to do it during summer (I took League's article to FA), but happy to see someone giving it some attention early. I might pick up the review for you, if my time allows. Given how new the game is, I can't imagine it'd need two people working on it, honestly. Wishing you the best! — ImaginesTigers (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]