This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Is there an official English term for the title? The current title looks more like Chinglish. User:kt2
Actually Legislative Yuan is the English official name for the body.
Sounds like Chinese-English mixture... Is that used among English speakers? :( --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 06:36, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
The media usually calls it "Taiwan's/Taiwanese parliament" or "Taiwan's/Taiwanese legislature" just as you will almost never see "Republic of China" show up in a news article. --Jiang
if the "Legislative Yuan" is not a common usage, why use that as the title? --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 06:50, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
It's common usage in Chinese, I believe. The English media usage is just wrong. --Jiang
Yuan's translation was changed from "branch" to "court" [1]. Would the latter translation apply to the other Yuans (Executive, Judicial,...) as well? --Menchi 09:09, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Yes; I think Sun Yat-sen meant for 'Yuan' to be 'court', similar to a court of consultation in monarchies such as the 'cortes' in Spain. --Kaihsu Tai 10:28, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
The article said the 2nd LY was elected in 1992. However, the 1st ended on Dec 31, 1991. It doesnt make sense that there was a period of time with no LY. What's the case here? --Jiang 01:01, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)
The article says: 'The legislative elections in 2002 produced a situation in which neither the pan-blue coalition nor the pan-green coalition has a majority in the legislature, making the passage of bills often dependent on the votes of a few defectors and independents.' But according to Adam Carr the election was in December 2001, and produced a slight majority for pan-blue. --Kaihsu Tai 17:15, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
"this is technically incorrect in Sun Yat-sen's political theory (see below), but practically the Legislative Yuan is the only standing parliamentary organ of that state since the late 1990s, and represents itself as such when working with parliamentary organs in other countries."
The definition of "parliament" is not limited to Westminister systems. Therefore, the use of the word "parliament" is only misleading, but not technically incorrect.
And "see below" to what? I can't find that that is referring to. --Jiang
There is a description of Sun Yat-sen's political theory below. --Kaihsu Tai 10:28, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
You mean "San-min Chu-i (political theory of Sun Yat-sen)"? If so, we should've just said that in the first reference. --Menchi 10:39, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
party affiliations
I would like to provide the political composition of the members (taking data from zh), but I don't know what 台湾吾党 is in English. --Jiang
Yep, got that. But where do these numbers come from? They don't agree with the 2001 election numbers. Where is there info on people getting replaced? --Jiang 22:12, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
At the official website's database, you can select the current members by party and eye-ball the #. Or you can count one-by-one using the complete list from ROC's Who's Who (valid as of 2002). Those are official lists. Stats from elsewhere may be counted by drunkards. Not trustworthy.
The official database in English seems to be only on the 4th Legislature. Whereas the 3rd, 4th, and 5th legislators' bios are all available in the Chinese versions. --Menchi 23:32, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I think those listed on the website are indeed members of the 5th LY. The url suggest so and people like Sisy Chen are listed.
Our figures show that compared with the 2001 election results, TSU lost 1, KMT list 2, independents gained 2, and TW No. 1 gained 1 since 20001. We should ask whoever inserted the info into the Chinese WP on where he got these figures. --Jiang 23:46, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Formulax did. English works with him. He's overseas. Try zh:User talk:Formulax. He'll respond within a day or two. --Menchi 23:50, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I got all the figures from the official website. It is different from the election results because one member from TSU was fired and became independent, and two guys quit from KMT. One of them joined 台湾吾党.--Formulax 07:26, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Isn't this the infamous parliament where all the fistfights erupt on a regular basis? Something should be written about that as well if that is the case. Gryffindor19:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
The article says: "On July 20, 2007, the Legislative Yuan passed the Lobbying Act, and Taiwan becomes the third country to pass the act." Just because Taiwan can pass acts does not make it a country. Choson4eva10:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I removed the latter part of that sentence on different grounds -- there's no reason to believe that Taiwan passed the same Lobbying Act as any other country did, as the sentence implied. --Metropolitan9004:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
just because Taiwan has limited international recognition, and political pressure from china does NOT mean it is not a country. that is in a dispute. so please, dont be politically arrogant!24.87.11.27 (talk) 06:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
2008 update required
The article needs some work to reflect the new system, I think. I've tried to update it as best I can (along with provisional election results), but I'm sure it will need someone to add more material and get rid of the old, irrelevant details. John Smith's (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Legislative Yuan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
