This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The style was criticised as "quaint, and certainly not belonging to a century other than the 21st."
It's probably supposed to say, "certainly belonging to" but I don't have access to the original. MosheEmes (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the same sentence was quoted in a book, This Realm of New Zealand: The Sovereign, the Governor-General, the Crown, as "quaint, and certainly belonging to a century other than the 21st."[1] I will correct the quote in the article. --Hazhk (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While the description of this instrument as a "royal decree" is indeed what is taught in NZ law schools, this description ignores the fact that Letters Patent are a well-established class of instruments, and also that using patents to erect vice-regal offices in the British Empire/Commonwealth is a standard non-eyebrow-raising move. However I see that there is a link to the main Letters Patent article later on. Perhaps stating somewhere that these Letters Patent are not an ad hoc creation may be useful. 101.113.148.66 (talk) 12:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
