Contents

Talk:Limnognathia

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animals Mid‑importance Limnognathia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Animals To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some Open Tasks : Copyedit: Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae), Requests: Mammals: Invertebrates: Campocraspedon Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

# of species[edit]

Is this the only species in its phylum? --Savant13 13:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.--Xvazquez 08:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Gordon reference (dated 2009) indicates that the taxon ranks of Micrognathozoa and Gnathifera are unsettled, but that Micrognathozoa along with Gnathostomulida, Rotifera, and Acanthocephala should be treated as sub-taxons of Gnathifera. I don't really care which ranks are assigned to taxons in the taxobox, but if Micrognathozoa ia to be listed as a Phylum, then Gnathifera should be listed as a superphylum. -- Donald Albury 18:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Limnognathia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090808201530/http://www.catalogueoflife.org/info_hierarchy.phptohttp://www.catalogueoflife.org/info_hierarchy.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323043528/http://www.calacademy.org/science_now/archive/headline_science/new_critter_120700.phptohttp://www.calacademy.org/science_now/archive/headline_science/new_critter_120700.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are Limnognathia maerski unicellular or multicellular? 50.204.33.189 (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in the taxobox in the upper right cormer of the article page, you will see that this is an animal, and if you click on 'Animalia', you will find that all animals are multicellular. That is the beauty of hyperlinks ("wikilinks" in Wikipedia speak); you can learn more and more by following links to other articles. Donald Albury 21:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]