Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Rename or Merge or leave alone?  
3 comments  













Talk:List of fossil pinnipedimorphs




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


4444hhhh (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename or Merge or leave alone?

[edit]

I'm currently in the process of overhauling the List of pinnipeds article to match the rest of the "species" lists for Carnivora (List of canids, etc.). That includes adding a section on prehistoric pinnipeds, which ends up mostly duplicating the bottom 2/3rds of this list (I have the general time period of the fossil instead of the namer, but the same species/genera). So, normally I'd just make this list redirect there, but this isn't exactly a 1-1 match, because it's not really just "fossil pinnipeds", it's "fossil pinnipedimorphs". So, should this list be renamed to "List of fossil pinnipedimorphs? Redirected to the main list? Or just left well enough alone? I'm leaning towards renaming, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it appears you're still maintaining it somewhat, 4444hhhh. --PresN 20:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going with rename for now, pending a broader way to deal with the fossil species that aren't in a modern family group, such as these pinnipedimorphs. --PresN 23:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! Just noticed the message now. The renaming is fine, and I had took quick look at that list you made for the list of pinnipeds. From what I understood the original intention of the article of just for recent species, though I am always down for fossil taxa to be included! Be careful of the PaleoDatabase as they are known to not exactly be the most reliable source at times.4444hhhh (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_fossil_pinnipedimorphs&oldid=1205768329"

Categories: 
List-Class mammal articles
Low-importance mammal articles
WikiProject Mammals articles
List-Class Marine life articles
Mid-importance Marine life articles
WikiProject Marine life articles
List-Class Palaeontology articles
High-importance Palaeontology articles
High-importance List-Class Palaeontology articles
WikiProject Palaeontology articles
Hidden category: 
Talk pages with comments before the first section
 



This page was last edited on 10 February 2024, at 11:03 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki