This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
The scope of the article is unclear based on this title. Was there a group called the Irregular Army? If not, it shouldn't be a proper noun. czar01:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Adding onto this. These groups aren't necessarily all groups of the KPG.
I propose renaming the page to "List of militant Korean independence activist groups". I'm going to go ahead and make the change and retool the infobox to reflect this. The page will still have a lot of issues afterwards, but it should be a start.
For others reading, if there's any disagreement around this, please let me know. Sorry for not waiting for consensus; as per WP:BOLD, I try to move a bit quickly. A lot of these pages are inactive anyway, and I'd like to think my changes are hopefully large steps in the right direction, even if they're not perfect. toobigtokale (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lot of issues related to grammar and formatting. Please be more thorough; look at featured articles like Cleopatra and please follow the rules in the WP:MOS to the best of your ability. The citations are good though. toobigtokale (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is the Korean People's Revolutionary Army a real unit, and what battles did they participate in? Or is it false and just propaganda or another name for the 6th Division, aka "Kim Il-Sung's Division"? Koreanidentity10000 (talk) 17:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Koreanidentity10000, good work on this page and others. There are some reference errors on this page; I posted previously on another talk page about this, but it looks like you're using Template:Sfn but the full references for some sources are not present on the page elsewhere.
@Koreanidentity10000 There are some harvard reference errors on this page as well. List: KJC1, KGM, BLC1, Hirsch & van der Walt 2010, Schmidt 2013, Gelderloos 2010, Hwang 2016, Chong-Sik Lee 1963, Kenneth M. Wells 1995, Xiaoyuan Liu 2002, Chang & Han 2015. toobigtokale (talk) 07:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overall note: the summaries of each group are currently too long regardless of future steps that we take. See WP:SUMMARY. I.e. no matter what we do, I think we should prune the length of any group's text on this page that already has its own full article. This is just my opinion, but I think pruning to 1–5 sentences per group can be done. There are dozens of militant independence activist groups; having more than that for each group may be too long for any article. Their stories also have a lot of overlap; enumerating all of their stories may not offer significant additional insight, when most people will be reading an overview article like this to get a big picture of what militant groups were like at the time.
I'm just going to give each group a small summary of short paragraphs (or one) highlighting the important aspects of each one giving the reader the main ideas about them and not make them tired of reading. Koreanidentity10000 (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]