Contents

Talk:List of physics journals

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Physics: Publications Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.

Untitled[edit]

Good article but where is nuclear physics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.79.162.143 (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought about putting these in a table with their respective impact factors? --Loodog (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this list serve a purpose that is not served by Category:Physics journals?RockMagnetist (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an answer to my own question: Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization#Are_."List_of_...."_articles_still_needed? RockMagnetist (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a cold fusion (LENR/LENT) peer reviewed physics journal. It has a rich history having provided a venue for research publication allowing for scientific review and advancement of this art to take place. [1]--Gregory Goble (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be listed in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.6.130.136 (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not unless it is notable and has an article (WP:WTAF). --Randykitty (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Progress in Physics peer-reviewed journal should be added. For example articles on Emdrive were published both in EPL and Progress in Physics - so I do not see a reason to consider it worse than EPL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musashi miyamoto (talk • contribs) 15:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Our article on this journal seems to establish that this is a fringe-science journal (of doubtful notability), which I don't think should be included in this list of notable physics journals, but I would appreciate the input of other knowledgeable editors here. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]