Contents

Talk:Loharu

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Thakur (title)#Thikana|thikanas]] Anchor Thakur (title)#Thikana links to a specific web page: Jagir. The anchor (#Thikana) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

I personally know few of them and most of them are in a very miserable conditions. see the link below for more reference. Loharu Nawab Kamran Khaliq. Pakistan. kamran_khaliq2003@yahoo.com

Indian descendants seem fine though, Member of Parliament, ministers etc...

Images:

• Nawab of Loharu - Sir Amir-ud-din Ahmad Khan 1884 image - British Library
• Nawab Alauddin Ahmed Khan of Loharu (1869-1884)
• Loharu House, Jaipur ---(Ekabhishek (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The book Reconstructing Indian History for S.R. Goyal, edited by Shankar Goyal. Jaipur, Book Enclave, 2003, ISBN 81-87036-99-0. , mentions Chapter 27. Jat agitation in Loharu State-1935 A.D, though need some more references or more details for the same! -- (Ekabhishek (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

hi i am rajnesh sangwan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.246.59 (talk) 11:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Loharu fort should be merged into Loharu. The Loharu article already contains a section on Loharu fort, and Loharu fort is a stub. It is also much easier to explain Loharu fort in the context of Loharu. No major change would be necessary, and the article weight will be kept under control. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZachAttrax (talk • contribs) 22:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems like a sensible suggestion.  Philg88 ^♦talk 05:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loharu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090830035822/http://hamidhussain.com/chapter5.aspxtohttp://hamidhussain.com/chapter5.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090830035822/http://hamidhussain.com/chapter5.aspxtohttp://hamidhussain.com/chapter5.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]