Contents

Talk:Lords of Appeal in Ordinary

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Number of Lords of Appeal in Ordinary[edit]

I've put an unreferenced template in this section as (apart from being unreferenced) this seems to contradict the actual numbers of Lords. The section presently says

The number of Lords of Appeal in Ordinary was increased from time to time — to three in 1882, to four in 1891, to six in 1913, to seven in 1919, to nine in 1947, to eleven in 1968 and to twelve in 1994.

...but I've totted up the numbers and an increase to ten came in 1963 or before, the increase to twelve by 1992 and not in 1994, and between 1995 and 2004 there were normally thirteen Lords of Appeal in Ordinary - unless I've made an obvious mistake somewhere. Opera hat (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, it looks like I have! Haven't quite worked out where yet though Opera hat (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so the numbers are actually fine, except that there was an increase to ten in 1963 or before. But there still isn't a reference given for any of this so the template might as well stay until there is. Opera hat (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Were the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary permitted to vote on legislation as the other lords did? Did there come a point when they didn't do so, as a matter of convention? --Jfruh (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a general reference to a usenet post that was just a bunch of quotes from another linked document. I thought of puuting it under a "external links" section but it seems really to trivial even there. But mabye someone could find leads to other sources from it or something other good of it. Anyway, here it is:

• Usenet posting from 2001 regarding the judicial function of the House of Lords

90.142.144.88 (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone answer the High Court article question posted at this link? Thank you in advance. Bo99 (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]