Contents

Talk:Louis Zhang Jiashu/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheLonelyPather (talk · contribs) 08:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell (talk · contribs) 07:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i aim to get through this in the next week or so ... sawyer * he/they * talk 07:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Take your time! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

The Atlantic article (Minter 2007) listed in the magazines section of the bibliography is unused - it has a harverror. There are also quite a lot of optimistic redlinks, which I'm absolutely not opposed to, but many of them are not introduced in the prose (such as Angelo Lazzarotto) and that would be good to clarify. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Removed the Atlantic article from the bibliography.
• Removed the red link over Angelo Lazzarotto, and clarified it. Now the general principle is to use red links only when there is another article in a different language.
• Substituted "lang-zh" templates with "zhi" templates. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 20:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything out there about his legacy? He died over 35 years ago; some hindsight about his impact on the Chinese Catholic Church would really round out the article for criteria 3a. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Can't find much. I will search a bit more later. I think his impact on the Chinese Catholic Church is his role in the founding of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA) and that he was the "bishop of Shanghai" during a large portion of the 20th century. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your intuition–I found quite a bit. I will expand his late years (post 1980) accordingly this week. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  awesome! i'll work on getting through the rest of the criteria this weekend :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 01:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sawyer-mcdonell I supplied some more information. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing - all the sources seem reliable & perfectly fine; glad to see a lot of academic sourcing here. I can't read the Chinese sources, but I spot-checked the citations to the main English-language sources (Mariani 2011 & 2016, Lazzarotto 2017) and everything looks good to me. I think the legacy aspect has been addressed, and I don't have any further concerns regarding the GA criteria. Excellent work! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 23:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. noWP:OR () 2d. noWP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.