Contents

Talk:Luís de Matos

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Portugal Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list Magic This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 06:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luís de Matos → Luis de Matos – Someone asked me by email. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did someone provide a rationale? Favonian (talk) 21:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly someone thinks he is a Spanish Luis? In any case Oppose since sources such as visit to the BBC show he is a Portuguese Luís. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. Luis is Spanish, but Luís is Portuguese. Red Slash 16:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Red Slash and In ictu oculi. His name is Portuguese not Spanish. EdJohnston (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

• I have just received an email asking me to remove the {{sources|date=May 2013}} at the top of page Luis de Matos (magician). Should this be done? I know nothing about Luis de Matos or about the magician trade in general. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article needs more inline citations. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 19:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Someone asked me to remove the {{peacock|date=May 2013}} tag ("This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner ...") from the start of page Luis de Matos (magician). Should this be done? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, although there are external link issues. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 19:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please let me know what issues are there with external links and what else can be done to completely remove the banner that still remains. I have made a big effort to add the requested information. Thank you.

AMASQ (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luís de Matos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130324211132/http://www.auditorio.com.mx/web/tohttp://www.auditorio.com.mx/web/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]