Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 EM index includes chinese companies - Controversy?  
4 comments  













Talk:MSCI




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


EM index includes chinese companies - Controversy?[edit]

1. FTSE, Dow Jones, Bloomberg, Solactive all have indices including chinese stocks. do they also under pressure from the chinese government? 2. The argument Chinese Government pressured MSCI to include stocks in their index is not sourced. There is only originally WSJ questioning it without even a reliable source. 3. How is including chinese companies so relevant to msci, that a paragraph in the lead is necessary? --WWbread (Open Your Mouth?) 20:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. If there are reliable sources saying so, then yes, such a view should presumably be included in corresponding articles. 2. This is sourced and elaborated in the main text, and the lead is a summary of it. 3. We should simply follow MOS:LEAD and WP:CREATELEAD to create a NPOV lead. Normchou💬 21:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1+2. Again. there is only a WSJ assumption on the reason that MSCI including China. WSJ mentioned there is no evidence or source but just "according to people familiar with the matter" to push away the responsibility and verifiability of the report. Strangely WSJ didn't assume the other stock index companies include them under pressure. 3. There is no need to include it in the lead because it doesn't reflect the correct importance of this action to the image of whole MSCI. It should be removed from the lead totally, and the "inclusion action" should be written more specifically. --WWbread (Open Your Mouth?) 07:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I trimmed the WP:OR/WP:SYNTH and WP:EDITORIAL content you added. Please WP:DISCLOSE if you are subject to WP:COI editing. Normchou💬 17:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MSCI&oldid=1208454372"

Categories: 
Start-Class company articles
Low-importance company articles
WikiProject Companies articles
Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
Start-Class New York City articles
Low-importance New York City articles
WikiProject New York City articles
 



This page was last edited on 17 February 2024, at 15:52 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki