| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mann Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 25, 2011, June 25, 2014, June 25, 2016, June 25, 2020, June 25, 2022, and June 25, 2024. |
The section "Notable individuals arrested" is difficult to read. It's in a quasi table format, however the text runs together and combined with the use of pronouns (he) it is difficult to tell who is being discussed. Specifically the transition from Chaplin to Dake gets muddled. Van Vidrine (talk) 14:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The first person prosecuted under the act was African-American heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson.[4] He had had an interracial affair with a white prostitute named Lucille Cameron, but she refused to cooperate with the prosecution..."
This should be edited to a more neutral "The first person prosecuted under the act was heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson.[4] He had had an affair with a prostitute named Lucille Cameron, but she refused to cooperate with the prosecution..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.11.250 (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would add that the description of Jack Johnson's conviction under the Mann Act in the "Prosecutions" section of the article is inconsistent with the description under "Notable Individuals Arrested" (the latter claims that he was convicted of transporting his white girlfriend (and later wife) across state lines, while the former clarifies that he was convicted of transporting a different white prostitute across state lines). AuH2ORepublican (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The ethnic descriptors should not be changed, as it is a notable reflection of the racism reflected in the culture at the time the Mann Act was enacted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.31.243.11 (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mann Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:38, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mann Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mann Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this section is kept, R. Kelly's conviction under the Act in Sept 2021 needs to be added. CountryMama27 (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't Ghislaine Maxwell being prosecuted under this? https://www.scribd.com/document/543104651/Ghislaine-Maxwell-Superseding-Indictment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cromwell88 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Legal application section states "The Mann Act has also been used by the U.S. federal government to prosecute polygamists (such as Mormon fundamentalists) because the U.S. has no federal law against polygamy." It excludes mention of the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act and the Edmunds Act which were upheld by the Supreme Court in Reynolds v. United States (1878) and Davis v. Beason (1890). See also: Legality of polygamy in the United States. CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
