A fact from Maria Clara gown appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
@MarkH21: Can you clarify the "sourcing issues"? From what I can see, it's mostly sourced albeit haphazardly, nothing that can't be fixed with copyediting, thus templating seems unnecessary.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL14:27, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Obsidian Soul: There are three entire paragraphs in “Modernization” without any citations, as well as several sentences in “Traditional components” that appear to have no citations (e.g. the mid-paragraph citations in the long middle paragraph suggests that the other sentences are unsourced). It’s also not clear if entire paragraphs with a single citation at the end are actually from the single source or if only parts of the paragraph are, but there’s enough missing from what I just pointed out for me to tag it. I can place cn tags if that makes it clearer — MarkH21talk16:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Obsidian Soul: I generally agree with that essay, but I find refimprove can be a useful tag for editors passing by to resolve issues if they can (as in this case), and as a warning for those reading the material. With your latest edits, just a few cns will do the trick as there are only relatively small portions left with unclear sourcing. — MarkH21talk04:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Maria Clara gown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.