Contents

Talk:Mars race

Page history

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. This page was proposed for deletionbyAndyjsmith (talk · contribs) on 7 April 2017 with the comment: This is a speculative essay that is better covered elsewhere. It was contested by [[User:70.51.200.162 (talk)|70.51.200.162 (talk)]] ([[User talk:70.51.200.162 (talk)|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/70.51.200.162 (talk)|contribs]]) on 06:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC) with the comment:[reply] The "speculation" is referenced, and does not qualify as WP:OR since it is from the references, and not the Wikipedian writers.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Mars task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance). An appropriate image needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be updated. Once this has been done, please remove the |needs-image=yes parameter from this template. Rocketry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an imageorphotographbeadded to this article. Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an imageorphotographbeadded to this article. Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Popular culture (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles Articles for creation Stub‑class This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article was accepted from this draft on 6 April 2017 by reviewer Yashovardhan Dhanania (talk · contribs).

I've removed a large amount of speculative and OR material. I'm not sure if there's anything worthwhile left that's not already covered better in the other Mars articles. Andyjsmith (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not OR since it is directly referenced. The speculation comes directly from the sources, so for the purposes of Wikipedia it is not original research, it is opinions of the sources, and not the Wikipedia writers. -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your editorial statement of Mars One as a scam does not mean that it does not exist. If you wish to delete MarsOne, this is not the article to do so. Our article on Inspiration Mars does not indicate current status. Also, not being able to support a separate article is not the same as not being relevant. Does every single thing in an article need to themselves be able to support an article? No other articles are like that. We don't need to write separate articles on every character from a TV show to have them mentioned in the TV show article. Further, we don't just live in the now. Just because something has died does not mean that it never happened or isn't relevant to the topic. -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]