Contents

Talk:Maryland Route 150

	Maryland Route 150 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 3, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  Maryland   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. Article recognition:   This article was the selected article of the Maryland Roads portalinMarch 2016.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 150/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 00:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a(prose): b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Try mixing in a few more names for MD 150. The subject of every sentence in the lead is invariably "MD 150" or "the state highway". The other sections are not as bad, but more names will not hurt. "Reaches its eastern terminus" is a bit wordy when "ends" accomplishes the same thing.

   I diversified the references to the state highway in the Lead and Route description and simplified the terminus.  VC  01:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

   Thank you. –Fredddie™ 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a(references): b(citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   The line about the highway being made of oyster shells should be referenced. I actually wanted to read more about that.

   Both the first and second sentences are referenced to Ref 5.  VC  03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

   There it is, thanks. –Fredddie™ 04:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a(major aspects): b(focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):

   More pictures can't hurt

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm placing this on hold to allow for a couple fixes. –Fredddie™ 01:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

   Thank you for your review, Fredddie.  VC  03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

   Passing the article now. –Fredddie™ 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]