This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 17 February 2012 by reviewer Dcshank (talk·contribs).
No, it doesn't. If there's a reliable source stating that "A number of publications claim that Mathematical Magick documents the alleged parachute descent of Fausto Veranzio (1551–1617), but no such claim is made in the book" then we could perhaps include one sentence. But a section at this length, detailing the Veranzio material which isn't in the book, is quite undue. Deltahedron (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder wether you really read the paragraph, where a number of sources for this claim are quoted. But how can you expect a reliable source for an urban legend? I would assume the number of references to the Mathematical Magick in these parachutist urban legend publications by far outnumbers references to it in the academic world. You can't stop an urban legend by withdrawing to highest academic standards - and I can't see an issue of NPOV or UNDUE. I put the paragraph back. --AHert (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling seems to have changed after the first edition from "Mathematicall Magick" (two L's) to "Mathematical Magick". I don't have a real source, just the listings on places like Amazon and Google books. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
