This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Griselda Blanco#Miami drug war|When enforcement efforts intensified in South Florida]] The anchor (#Miami drug war) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 1 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ag611232.
The "course of the conflict" section needs to be updated. With the deaths of Lazcano (I know he's marked dead in the infobox, but it should be included in the article as well) and Manuel Torres Félix, the section should definitely be updated. Just adjusting the infobox is not good enough. -- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. Feel free to update the article. Right now I'm solely concentrating on biographies, and I'll probably stick with them for some months. ComputerJA (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seeing this issue being added and removed, with both sides not offering much in the way of discussion. Personally I favor deletion; most of the sources currently used to support the allegations are from conspiracy theory or otherwise fringe political sites. Some of them don’t even talk about the Mexican Drug War at all (one goes on and on about the Contras but hardly even mentions Mexico). Get better sources or don’t include it, that’s my stance.Jogarz1921 (talk) 23:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jogarz1921: Are you specifically referring to the CIA allegations in the infobox? Or what exactly? I think the infobox needs a major clean-up. I get that the CIA has been suspected of working with drug trafficking groups for decades, but flooding these claims with sources to tilt this allegation on one side more than the other is problematic. Please feel free to trim most of the information you deem inappropriate. I will be reviewing the changes you do, and we can always circle back here to discuss. I personally wouldn't delete all the allegations, but trimming them down is a must. This article needs a major clean-up. I hope to get to it someday in the future. Regards, MX (✉ • ✎) 23:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MX:, yeah, I was referring to the infobox. Obviously everyone knows that the CIA has had dealings in the drug trade, but claiming that they support the Cartels against the Mexican government in the current conflict is an audacious claim indeed. I’d approve it if the sources were good, but right now most of them aren’t. It’s just gish gallop.Jogarz1921 (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, if a town's local mafia hires some Chinese dudes to shake some store owners for "protection", it does not mean that that the Cartel(s) are formally supported by China. The same with FARC, as they will sell cocaine to any buyer. That Infobox is full of alleged (unproven) links blown out of proportions, and make it look like a summary of World War 3. That is unacceptable. The consensus seems to clean it up (delete them). So I am going ahead. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would just add that it seems odd to me that the PRI is labeled as "centrist." It seems more fitting to call them a less loaded term like "institutionalist" or "dominant party." Their long history of populism, nationalization, and protectionism hardly earns them the deference of "centrist." Although maybe that can be considered the center in Mexico. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.14.135 (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say we have to wait a while. Peña Nieto also stated he would move away from the "kingpin strategy" and focus on reducing crime. The reality was completely different since his security plan included an undisclosed list of 122 most-wanted criminals to target (most who were in fact arrested). Seems more like a political move with no real impact. MX (✉ • ✎) 19:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This war did not stop overnight just because AMLO said so unilaterally. If he proposed a coherent strategy, we have not heard of it and nothing stops the narcos to continue their war against the population and against other competing cartels. A campaign promise is far from having ended the war. Do not confuse facts with demagoguery. The violence continues, and many capos are still to be arrested, and they will not go down peacefully, nor their rivals will respect the vacuum left. Rowan Forest (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox has been greatly reduced. The main problem is that our readers are misled into believing that the cartels are all on the same side. Jim Michael (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
File:Criminal organizations presence (2020).png and its use[edit]
File:Criminal organizations presence (2020).png
The map used in the infobox, File:Criminal organizations presence (2020).png, is presented in said infobox in a way which implies that it is a territorial map, represents where in the states each cartel is located. But it’s not, it seems to show what state each cartel has a presence in, in a manner which looks like a territorial map. This is confusing, as seen by derivative maps (File:La Familia Michoacana presence.png, File:Los Zetas presence.png, and File:Sinaloa Cartel presence.png) which use it to display the territory of specific cartels. I’ve been bold and removed it, but it)s going to need to be discussed further here I feel. MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 06:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki Education assignment: LIBR 1 Working with Sources[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2022 and 20 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EL203 (article contribs).
The term "War on drugs" originated in American politics, referring to a wide range of policies meant to suppress domestic use of illegal drugs. The term is designed to be incendiary and motivating to American voters without representing any specific political program, and it does not refer to some kind of ongoing military conflict in the United States between drug dealers and the government, as there is in Mexico. Therefore, it is not appropriate to uncritically describe the low-intensity civil war the Mexican people have suffered as "a theatre of the war on drugs." Therefore, I have simply moved the "war on drugs" phrasing to a little lower in the article's lead. Spacemarine10 (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, while not confirmed whether to be a drug cartel or not, it is likely either a gang or a cartel, the funky town infamous gore video. It's a horrible video to watch, but I feel as though with the level of infamy it's gained online, it should at least get a minor mention, with a disclaimer saying it's unconfirmed as to whether it's a drug cartel. Theweast234 (talk) 09:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]