| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The article describes Ready, Steady Go! as “a forerunner of MTV-type programming” - surely an unwarranted comaprison? RSG! was just one of many studio-based pop programmes - such as Top of the Pops, Six Five Special and American shows such as American Bandstand. As such shows were commonplace, and still existed after the start of MTv (which was, at its inception, largely not live music performed in a studio setting), I’d think the comparison was un-necessary, unless there is some direct line specifically between the production of RSG! and MTv? Jock123 (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How did he get around the US Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 8? "No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state." 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Lindsay-Hogg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am modifying the discussion of his parentage by Welles to the word "argues" because it is not necessarily factually proved. Unfortunately Patrick McGilligan seems unaware that a "full" pregnancy is now considered to be 10 months and it *is* possible to have an overdue pregnancy of 11 months or longer. McGilligan is probably not aware that there is considerable variation among women, for example, some women have 27 day menstrual cycles and others 32 day cycles, which is why a pregnancy "due date" is a nebulous concept that has changed as the understanding of pregnancy has grown.
Since Fitzgerald told her friend Vanderbilt that Welles was the father (and would obviously know if they were intimate in a time that would enable pregnancy), there is a facial similarity, and Welles' own daughter suspected their relation, McGilligan could be incorrect about parentage. He is definitely incorrect about it being a "biological impossibility". However, I am not eliminating his suggestion, simply noting that it is that - a suggestion, not necessarily fact. 73.115.53.151 (talk) 06:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think the infobox needs a more recent picture of him, and put the toddler image in the early life section. --121.221.134.214 (talk) 23:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
