This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Thank you for bringing this here. I do not like the James Bond idea, but I can approve the Jason Bourne style. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking that we could use this image instead. The box set of the original trilogy may help benefit the article more for first-time readers because it shows accurately what the English editions look like and they use the word "Millennium" so it doesn't look odd. Anyone else agree or disagree? Lucia Black (talk) 20:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gareth Griffith-Jones:It is under copyright, but there's not a non-copyright image that can replace it. And if put under use, there wont be another copyright image that can replace it. Plus, its only an angled side of the image, plus the spines of all the books written by Stieg Larrson Lucia Black (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If I were you, I would be inclined to make the revision and step back for the reaction ... "Nothing ventured and all that"— | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
BRD rule it is then. I made the change for the table, and no issues (so far) with the same mind set. Lucia Black (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Didnt work out.but I'll see what I can do. Lucia Black (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I was afraid it has been removed. Pretty quickly too. I have restored the original for now. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 18:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Its fine. There used to be a different piece of work. I think the only thing I can do is modify it. Lucia Black (talk) 19:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Millennium (novel series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
