 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs)
The majority of the article was written from the very informative biography from the National Academy of Science. I think we'll need some more sources if we are to improve the article. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This sound like it's made up. It's much colder in Beijing in winter and he liked it there. Anon user 09:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is some ambiguity about how to write M. C. Chang's name in Chinese characters. At birth, M. C. Chang's name was written 张民觉 (where 民 = min = the people). However, his widow told me that after he graduated from Tsing Hua University, he wrote his name as 张明觉 (where 明 = ming = bright) — which was how he signed his name throughout his adult life. However, in mainland China, his name is still written in its original form. Cwkmail (talk) 07:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the Chinese biography of M. C. Chang by Zhao Zhi Zhong (Father of the Test Tube Baby), Chang's name is written in its original form. However, the book also includes photos of documents in Chang's handwriting. These documents include his signature, and on the documents, he used the later form of his name. The Communist Chinese government commissioned the Chang biography by Zhao -- for the occasion of the unveiling of a bust of Chang. I don't know whether the government used the original form of Chang's name because they wanted to be historically accurate or because "people" (min) sounded more politically correct, more egalitarian, than "bright" (ming). (The Chang biography by Zhao also omitted the fact that Chang's father was a small landlord -- probably because being a landlord with tenant farmers is regarded as politically incorrect.) The issue of Chang's signature deserves, at most, a footnote. By the way, I have the e-mail address of Chang's widow, but I don't want to post it. Cwkmail (talk) 00:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
HongQiGong (talk · contribs) and 216.195.25.224 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) have been edit-warring over some stuff about Chang's wife/wives for over a month now. Really, though, both these editors' versions are totally unsourced, so I don't see how either is better than the other; I have removed the material in question entirely. If someone wants to restore either version, provide sources to support it. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
An image used in this article, File:MCChang.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Min Chueh Chang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
