This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article was copy editedbyMiniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 2, 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Would splitting off the scandal as a separate level-3 header be warranted? My concern is that on the one hand, we shouldn't slant the article towards recent events (WP:DUE, WP:NOTNEWS), but on the other, it may well end up being a very significant event from the organization, and reliable sources have talked about it losing public funding from CRDA, which would be a large setback.--Jasper Deng(talk)19:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet. Right now, we've got a good description of the events and its aftermath, and it doesn't overwhelm the History sub-section. If that changes, we can then talk about whether this event "opened a new chapter" in the organization's history. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Opening line of main body states "Miss America is a beauty pageant" this should be changed to "Miss America is a competition". This is clearly stated publicly and unambiguously by Miss America Chair of the Board Gretchen Carlson on a televised interview for ABC News. The moment this is stated can be seen here [1] in the time frame between 0:22 and 0:26. Gretchen Carlson then goes on to state that "We will no longer judge our candidates on their outward physical appearance." This is why I suggest removing any reference to the words beauty as well as changing pageant to competition. This is in the same linked video time frame 0:25 to 0:30. Thank you for considering my edit request as it is my first time doing this and I hope I have followed the conventions in use. Zegrze (talk) 20:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps something should be said about the relationship or nonrelationship to other titles/competitions: Miss USA, Miss World, Miss Universe. I always thought Miss America was part of the Miss Universe world, but apparently not. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:9C6B:5193:60E8:85E1 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I recently made an article for the Miss America 2025 and related pageant for Wikipedia, but it was stated before this article can be included onto the English Wikipedia it needs to be made neutral, more references will be needed and more information is required along with the facts before this Miss America article is included onto EnWiki with detail involving the contestants and the crowning of the 2025 Miss America. Angela Kate MaureenPears14:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Omschrijving: Miss-verkiezingen. De winnares van de Miss America verkiezing 1924 laat zich toejuichen, staande in een versierde auto in haar woonplaats. Philadelphia, USA, 1924