Contents

Talk:Molly house

Molly house received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gender studies High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't think this is correct: "homosexuality in England was illegal, punishable by execution". Wasn't it buggery that was illegal, rather than homosexuality per se? DavidFarmbrough 08:37, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality was recriminalised by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885. Dave420 12:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not correct, homosexuality was never illegal. It was homosexual acts that were banned. The Act criminalized "gross indecency with another male, whether "in public or in private"".203.184.41.226 (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have this direct to a fish instead? At least have a disambiguation?

See Molly for disambiguation. Ashley VH (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to Rock 'n' Roll lore, the song "Good Golly Miss Molly" by Little Richard (1956) was a direct refrence to this and alludes to his days as a drag queen in such an establishment.

See [[1]]

Stratuser (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You would need a WP:RS before you can insert that here, and there isn't one on that page - the only source (Rolling Stone) makes no mention of this. Mish (talk) 10:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know a lot of TV's nower days like BDSM and there must have been men back then sort out suck activitys. There are no references to any place where men could go and see a dominatrix. There must have been somewhere, its like prostitution its one of the oldest professions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.121.129 (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everybody contributing to this page. I'm a student from a History of English Culture class at Ca' Foscari University and as part of my exam I chose to (try and) contribute to the improving of this article. My references for the moment are:

• Tim Hitchcock & Robert Shoemaker, Tales from the Hanging Court, Hodder Education 2007, pp.12-17
• The Old Bailey Online proceedings
• Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook. Updated 15 April 2015
• [2]
• [3]

Any advice (as for bibliography or editing) will be very appreciated. Thank you. --Pbord (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can also have a look at the book prof. Clegg suggested:

• English masculinities, 1660-1800, edited by Tim Hitchcock and Michèle Cohen, London ; New York : Longman, 1999

It is available in the University library Ca' Foscari BALI - Studi Europei e Postcoloniali. You can look for its collocation in the University's On-line Public Access Catalogue. Altereli (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I borrowed it along with other texts I will add soon to the list. Pbord (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you have already been checking the Old Bailey website, but I have found this, and I think it might provide you with some new information, especially because of the introductory reading you find at the bottom of the page! Here you go: The Old Bailey - Homosexuality Asile91 (talk) 11:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Asile91:, thank you for reminding me that link, it was one of the first article I read but I almost forgot it while looking for other suggestions!

Hi Pbord! I have chosen your article to do the assignment of week 10.So I hope you do not mind me offering suggestions to you. I will be just telling some of the things I would do at this point if I had to expand this article. But, of course, the validity and pertinence of my advice needs to be checked with our instructors. I really like the general structure but I would at least add more information in the sections "Famous molly houses in London", "Molly Houses and law enforcement" and "Trials related to molly houses". Perhaps, one could give more details about the mentioned people, places and acts (ex. Margaret Clap, Buggery Act 1533 and Charles Hitchen). In addition, one could report the story of one or more exemplary cases in the section "Trials related to molly houses". Thank you! Ml17221746 (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ml17221746:, actually I'm currently working on the expansion of the sections you just cited, unluckily the difficulties I find lay in the integration of the content that was already present and my sources, and this slows considerably my work. Anyway, thank you very much, your feedback tells me I'm going to the right direction.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Molly house. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090719214414/http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&bookkey=43233tohttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&bookkey=43233

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]