This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Can someone take a picture with people in? It's impossible to gauge the size of it.
There are many persons visible on the picture - they are just 50 times smaller than the monument! --Matthead 01:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I took a picture of the Leipziger Badewannenrennen, last summer. I could upload it later. There are boats on the lake and a lot of people around it. Maybe later the day... — N-true 18:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know it is POV, but perhaps something should be mentioned about the unapologetically manipulative world view/POV-pushing that stands out on the displays within the monument itself. See for yourself:
One reads: "If the monument collapses, it could itself become an indication for peace and the transcience of war." (Quote from SPD Representative)
Fortunately, this article is fine - it does not feel the need to forcefeed ideology to its guests like these ultraliberal internationalist propagandists.--Hohns3 18:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
actually, this figure is not a "proud germanic knight" but St. Michael, patron saint of chrisitan soldiers styled as a knight. Don't know if this should be mentioned... Zemlod 12:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He's also patron saint of the german people, by the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.75.90.134 (talk) 07:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this sentence in the article: "It was one of the first major structures to make extensive use of concrete, although the facings are of granite." Although this is consistent with information found on the website relating to the restoration, this statement is dubious. Concrete has been around for a long time. --Lockley 06:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It also later suggests concrete, a famously ancient building material was "relatively new at the time". My hunch is that they are referring to steel-reinforced concrete, but without the cited sources at hand it's hard to know. I suggest this page be flagged.
@94.101.40.4: I took that from Poser's book. Maybe this is a case of lost in translation, since the book is translated from German into English. Will check up on that. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The museum organization that operates the monument calls it Monument to the Battle of the Nations. Variations of the name exist, and I'm not sure if one is official or not, so i'd recommend this museums' spelling. —fudoreaper (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Doesn´t the Motherland Monument in Kiev (102 m) or the Spike of Dublin (120 m) count?
(as always wikipedia is NOT to be trusted) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.216.206.4 (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We say that both are taller, and both seem to be monuments. I've added a fact tag to the sentence in the article, but it looks like anonymous has pointed out a legitimate problem with the article. —fudoreaper (talk) 05:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"The monument is widely regarded as one of the best examples of Wilhelmine architecture."
I would like to discuss this sentence. Unfortunately there is no source. I understand that the historic period is meant with "Wilhemine". But its a problem to characterize a building with this term because there wasn't just one style in architecture during time of the Kaiserreich. Actually Wilhelm II. did not like the Völkerschlachtdenkmal because it glorifys the sacrifice of people not a dynasty. It is built in Jugendstil with some references to Reformstil but not in a historistic style which was prefered for official buildings up to the end of the Kaiserreich while it was already quite unpopular among many architects. --Ickerbocker (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Monument to the Battle of the Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Monument to the Battle of the Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
