This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Moon Museum received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from Moon Museum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Hello!
Today (21 September 2013) this article was featured in Facebook.
The references in the article are not convincing to me or they are even broken.
I believe, this article is a hoax, although the history of the article goes back to 15 July 2010 and it was said to be on a peer review Wikipedia:Peer review/Moon Museum/archive1.
Can anyone else check the references again? At least it should be more stressed in the article that there is no official or reliable source given.
Thanks!
Projekt ANA (talk) 11:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for bringing that up. I attempted to find if it was rehosted anywhere on the UCSD site or on the web but didn't get any results. Unfortunately, archive.org and archive.is got to it after the blog was discontinued. Sadly this link will probably have to stay dead, but on Wikipedia we keep even links that don't work. You might wish to see WP:LINKROT for more information. Again, thanks. Opencooper (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Moon Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The article claims that "Both John Chamberlain and Claes Oldenburg have confirmed through representatives that they contributed drawings to Moon Museum", and cites this to this AOL News article. However, there is nothing in there about Chamberlain's or Oldenburg's representatives confirming that they were involved. --Metropolitan90(talk)13:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]