Contents

Talk:Mount Foraker

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofAlaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mountains High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heading text[edit]

Wrong photograph --Flyby678 (talk) 14:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it the view fom Mount Foraker? Or just completely unrelated? —hike395 (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both photos definitely show Mt. Foraker, so I'm not sure what Flyby is referring to. Zaereth (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is in fact a photo of Mckinley. Compare to this shot of mckinley from the north.

http://www.free-desktop-backgrounds.net/Nature-landscapes-wallpapers/Mountains-wallpapers/Aerial-view-mountain-McKinley-Alaska.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigphishy56 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure looks, from every published list and studying maps, that it's the second-highest in the range. Anyone know what was meant, or was this simply a mistake due to it being the third-highest in the state? 2600:1700:A644:6000:75DD:70EC:14B9:476B (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would guess it's because Denali has two peaks. The south peak is the highest (and most climbed) at over 20,000 feet, while the north peak is just over 19,000 feet. Then Foraker at just over 17,000 feet. Zaereth (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]