Contents

Talk:Mud logging

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Mud log page were merged into Mud logging on 2009-05-13. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Mudlogger page were merged into Mud logging on 2009-05-13. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This page is garbage and needs to be edited. Sounds like some dumb goober writ it up while on tower.

I propose that this one be removed immediately after scavenging any useful bits, and merging the other two remaining. Mydogtrouble (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The illustrations here are good. They also exist in Mud log. But not in Mudlogger. I added the bit here I found relevant to Mudlogger in preparation to merge IT with Mud log. I think this article is ready for deletion. Request editor assist in this. Mydogtrouble (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typically we don't delete a merged article, we redirect it to the new article. I'll do this... TastyCakes (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait so what is the final article going to be? Mud log or mud logger? Personally, I think I would have chosen mud logging as the combined article name, since it would seem to contain both mud logs and mud loggers, whereas the other two don't... The title also agrees with the other "well logging" articles, such as sonic logging and density logging. TastyCakes (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My style says it is two words: Mud logging. This one, with the correct name, was the worst article however. One supposes the final merged article should be named "Mud logging" although the "Mud log" article was about the best of the lot. The redirect from here is great. Good work. Mydogtrouble (talk) 20:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't made any redirects yet... Do you want me to replace this article with what's at mud log now? TastyCakes (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would redirect to either one, at this point. I'm cleaning up "mudlogger" now, just so I can get its useable paragraphs ready to merge with "mud log." Which as I mentioned, I feel should be renamed finally "Mud logging". I should have moved the other stuff here, maybe! :) Mydogtrouble (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think what needs to be done is move the text from Mudlogger here, and then merge selected text from Mud log to here as well. Let me return when I am more focused and I will do that. That way the graphics will already be here and the article here is titled correctly. Mydogtrouble (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that sounds good. TastyCakes (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mudlogger text merged with this article now and probably should be redirected to this article. Next will be merging Mud log with this article. Mydogtrouble (talk) 16:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mud log text merged with this article now Mydogtrouble (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other articles should be redirected to this one now and archived. Hope a qualified editor does this. Mydogtrouble (talk) 00:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is a repeated image in this article. The image, I have to admit, is remarkably good for explanation purposes, but is it really necessary to put it twice? Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mud logging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060915063420/http://www.wellsight.com/images/logs/well-ft-log.jpgtohttp://www.wellsight.com/images/logs/well-ft-log.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]