Contents

Talk:Names of Beijing

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Cities Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because content is moved here from the main Beijing article to allow this topic to be elaborated while at the same time, reducing the length of the same topic in the main Beijing article. --ContinentalAve (talk) 20:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: RESULT: Move to Names of Beijing. — LlywelynII 12:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing (name) → Names of Beijing – to conform to other articles that detail the various names of a location, and historical names for that location. This article covers not the name "Beijing" but the names for the place known as Beijing, since "Beiping" and "Yanjing" (etc) is not the name "Beijing" but other names for the place "Beijing" (they are completely different names, and not just alternate spellings) 70.24.247.66 (talk) 03:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support. The proposed title both better reflects the contents of the article and is consistent with other similar articles (e.g., Names of Seoul, Names of Singapore). —  AjaxSmack  20:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Support for same reasons as Ajax. --RJFF (talk) 10:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. & with it being one week and unanimous, will start the close. — LlywelynII 12:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Probably the best thing would be to have the names in a table, although that could get messy as the divisions change over time.

etc... — LlywelynII 13:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Names of Beijing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927215137/http://chinaheritagenewsletter.anu.edu.au/articles.php?searchterm=016_mingancestor.inc&issue=016tohttp://chinaheritagenewsletter.anu.edu.au/articles.php?searchterm=016_mingancestor.inc&issue=016

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]