This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
NASDAQ → Nasdaq – Formalizing the above move request, the all-caps styling has not been the proper name of this stock exchange in many years. It is not only no longer styled as such by the exchange themselves in either text or their logo, but also by third-party coverage from such reliable sources as The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, who might know a thing or two about the stock markets. oknazevad (talk) 05:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think so. None of the sources I've seen spell it as all caps anymore, just like the exchange itself. oknazevad (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as noted it isn't even styled with caps, clearly caps are inappropriate. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per nom and above. O.N.R.(talk) 21:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nasdaq website. Sideriver84 (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Internet wasn't created till 1983, so I don't think the NASDAQ was really created in 71, as a global trading system. Perhaps there were 5 or 6 guys with file on companies on their computers, but they had to punch cards to talk to the thing, so.... come on now, let's get it right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:4404:D1D4:5DCB:8741:C016:882C (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that computer networking long predates the global internet, right? oknazevad (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata says that NASDAQ had its conception on the 4th of February 1971, while the article says it was found on the 8th of February. Which is correct? toreau (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should all the "NASDAQ" acronyms be changed to "Nasdaq" to conform with their name change SEC filing from 2017[edit]
Only for ones after the change. The ones from before were still properly all caps reflecting the name's original creation as an acronym. That they later went to mixed case can and should be mentioned, and references after that should be in said mixed case, but it would be anachronistic to use it before the official change. oknazevad (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
