This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
And who made you the ruler of what goes and what doesn't? This article is full of advertisements and statements without citation that may be removed (see note at the top of the article). I am trying to enhance the quality of this article by removing extraneous material and adding supporting material. There is no vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.237.27.154 (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That article indicates that an employee of the company created the original Wikipedia entry two years ago. It says nothing about future employee edits. Now, looking at the IP addresses in the edit history can better show if and when employees have edited the entry.
The original IP is in the range of 130.164.71.x, from March 2004.
An IP in the range 130.164.76.x edited again in September 2004, removing a link to a 2003 press release.
130.164.73.x corrected a factual mistake in October 2004. (The article stated the company was not named a "Top 100 Company to Work For" in 2004 when, in fact, they were.
130.164.79.x updated the "Top 100" data again in January 2005, indicating another year on the list.
130.164.77.x capitalization change in August 2005.
130.164.73.x added an internal link in June 2006.
If any of those were inappropriate, the company may deserve criticism. (I don't know those were all employees, but the IPs are similar.) I don't think that original linked article has anything worthy of criticism. 71.145.143.3405:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just as an FYI, I did a big edit of the article today. I'm a former employee of NI, and haven't worked there in over a year. I left of my own accord partly because they don't treat IT workers well, but I tried to be as objective as possible. If anyone has a problem with anything I added, please feel free to remove. Karanacs19:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
added an external link to NI's corporate blog. June 19
I have just modified 3 external links on National Instruments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Hello all!
I added a bit about the development history of Electronics Workbench based on two sources I found. The one that discusses Roy Bryant's role as COO includes information that contradicted the unverified 1995 founding date, so I removed that date. July 8 2020
