This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
"Re-re-added omissions. ;-) The version reverted to was missing a couple of important things." What is that supposed to mean? How can it miss a couple of stuff, when you're removing the content? Look, I'm getting tired of this. If you want to add vital content to the article, do it. But don't remove facts from it. Stop reverting. EliasAlucard|Talk 16:52, 21 Jun, 2005 (UTC)
Hello! :)
I understand you have a sense of propriety over this article and feel protective towards this software product. But we have to remember that Wikipedia articles are supposed to be first and foremost informative.
So, I invite you to read the new version. It looks shorter, but actually adds a couple of important points:
That the product is primarily a DVD ripper.
That it does not ship as DirectShow/VfW codecs, hence prohibiting it from being used in general video work.
That Nero Showtime is needed to view subtitles ripped from DVD.
I agree that it's a good codec, but these are important things that should be pointed out about the product: especially for people who are seeking DivX alternatives, or who are ripping subtitled DVDs. It's somewhat frustrating when you revert these additions.
And finally, if it was my writing style that annoyed you (I guess I can be very obtuse at times), why not add them yourself?
This is not true, VLC can play the subtitles. You're stripping it down, you've removed a lot of stuff. Most of the stuff you've added are true, but that was also the case with the stuff you've removed.
Which important points were removed? I'd be happy to add them back in if I indeed threw out something important. Let's seek the union of our two versions of the article.
I have just modified 4 external links on Nero Digital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
