 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I believe that the list of affiliates, in addition to receiving a major cleanup, needs to be split off as a new article, which should be located at List of Network One affiliates. The affiliate list articles for most networks -- even UATV and MTV2 -- are separate from the network's article, and Network One should be no exception. Anyone else agree? --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I was thinking the same thing when I added some stuff a while ago. I don't, however, have the time or ambition to do it. MindScream 18:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I split off the affiliate listing as requested. JMyrleFuller 4:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I added the "disputed" tage for Network One, since I feel that the information presented is not correct. Being a latecomer to the large dish C-Band in 1997, I know for a fact that Network One was on the air at that time, and I think didn't close down until as late as 1998 or 1999.
Also, Network One's satellite signal was always in the clear until it folded. -- azumanga 23:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who said it was scrambled at any point? Anyway you are right. I got my decades screwed up. It should read early 1990s to late 1990's. My stupid head was on dumb mode that day when I wrote the history and I just hadn't noticed until you pointed it out. If I remember right I think it cratered it in about 98, just around the time the Syndicated Entertainment Television channel disappeared a few transponders down. If this solves the dispute, please make the changes and remove the tag. Nels Nielson 04:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:NetworkOne.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Network One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
