Contents

Talk:New Australia

A fact from New Australia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that New Australia was a utopian settlement founded in Paraguayin1893 by former members of the Australian labour movement? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/July.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Australia: Politics Mid‑importance New Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. South America: Paraguay Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Paraguay (assessed as Mid-importance). Organized Labour Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Australia changed its name to Nueva Londres. Here is a very recent article regarding Nueva Londres from July 7, 2015, with a lot of information: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/06/nueva-londres-paraguay-australia-great-britain

"It was founded as Nueva Australia in 1893 by a handful of families" "When Juan Kennedy, her uncle, wrote to Australia to rename the town Nueva Canberra, the letter was never answered – so they went for London instead.

As it was founded as Nueva Australia shouldn't that page (Nueva Londres) be merged with this?Nickm57 (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I'm feeling too lazy to do it at present but maybe something could be added to the page about the new book (well 2012) by Ben Stubbs, Ticket to Paradise, about New Australia. Roosters93 (talk) 13:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look on google earth, going off the maps from http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/rare/newoz/ issue 7 number 1. It seems the location of the main settlement (matching with the maps geography, and about 15km NE of 'Villarica, paraguay') is around 25°36'58.41"S 56°19'37.95"W. This isnt what is said on the main page (150km SE of asuncion), but about 82.5miles E of asuncion. Maybe Cosme is the settlement further south? I dont know. It seems from http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~brianj/Gabalah/history.html that it still exists as a farming village.

Anyone more sure of this than I am? Im a bit hesitant to update the main page without sureness.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Miscreant (talk • contribs)

Thanks, It was me that put that distance from Asuncion and I believe that you're correct. My distance was based on a rough look at the map/s without too much science (being slack!) and was done before I realised that Cosme was 62 km further south than N/Aust. I've removed the distance entirely from the map caption to avoid any further confusion. I suggest that the coords (and if possible, exact distances) would be a good addition to the article. -- I@n 01:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]