Contents

Talk:Newtimber

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sussex Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Saddlescombe page were merged into Newtimber on 6 September 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

I suggest we add a Notable buildings and areas section with Newtimber Wood and areas on the scarp and downland like Newtimber Holt, Summer Down and the Dyke Golf Course and we move Saddlescombe into the section, but keep the listed buildings and scheduled monuments section separate. Paolo Oprandi (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Saddlescombe to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 05:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I've proposed the merger. Topo122 (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newtimber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdftohttp://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]