Contents

Talk:Nuclear power in Ireland

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naming[edit]

There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 October 2016[edit]

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear energy in the Republic of Ireland → Nuclear energy in Ireland – The electric grid on the Island of Ireland is one single unit, as discussed in the intro of this article. Moreover there is no article on "Nuclear Energy in N.Ireland" as N.Ireland has likewise never had any nuclear fission-electric power stations. Furthermore, as this article contains detailed info on the entire Island of Ireland and does not simply discuss Éire/"the republic", the article therefore is quite clearly erroneously titled "nuclear energy in the "Republic of" Ireland". Boundarylayer (talk) 02:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Well-reasoned and accurate argument. AusLondonder (talk) 08:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Good reasons. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – @Boundarylayer: If this article is moved, do you think that Nuclear power in the United Kingdom ought to be moved to Nuclear power in Great Britain (as it does not appear to address Northern Ireland)? 207.161.217.209 (talk) 01:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(And presumably if that were done, Nuclear power in the United Kingdom would become a disambiguation page.) 207.161.217.209 (talk) 01:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iadded a "see also" link to the Nuclear power in the United Kingdom article. Editors are free to add a section discussing N. Ireland to that article. There is no need for a name change, and certainly we wouldn't disambiguate this broad concept. wbm1058 (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nuclear energy in Ireland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160317091430/https://esb.ie/main/about_esb/powerstations/moneypoint/stationhistory/construction.jsptohttp://www.esb.ie/main/about_esb/powerstations/moneypoint/stationhistory/construction.jsp
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20081008105516/http%3A//www.dcenr.gov.ie/Press%2BReleases/Minister%2BRyan%2BCalls%2BHalt%2Bto%2BUranium%2BExploration%2Bin%2BIreland.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]