Contents

Talk:Nuremberg trials

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuremberg trials article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days

Nuremberg trials is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones Date Process Result July 23, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed March 22, 2022 Good article nominee Listed August 9, 2022 Featured article candidate Not promoted August 9, 2023 Featured article candidate Promoted Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 20, 2005, November 20, 2006, November 20, 2007, November 20, 2008, November 20, 2013, November 20, 2015, and November 20, 2023. Current status: Featured article

This  level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Military history: British / European / German / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force German military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Germany High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. European history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. International relations: Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as High-importance). Human rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy editedbyDhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 13–18 June 2022.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

On 8 April 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from Nuremberg TrialstoNuremberg trials. The result of the discussion was moved.

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1046045 https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1173344 https://twitter.com/FranHirsch/status/1443925053888995358 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/perspectives-on-the-nuremberg-trial-9780199232338?lang=en&cc=us#

• Bloxham, Donald (2001). Genocide on Trial: War Crimes Trials and the Formation of Holocaust History and Memory. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820872-3.
• Salter, Michael (2007). Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nuremberg: Controversies Regarding the Role of the Office of Strategic Services. Routledge-Cavendish. ISBN 978-1-904385-81-3.
• Mouralis, Guillaume (2019). "Retrouver les victimes. Naufragés et rescapés au procès de Nuremberg". Droit et société. 102 (2): 243. doi:10.3917/drs1.102.0243.
• Nowak-Korcz, Paulina (2021). "Le génocide des nazis dans les témoignages des interprètes et traducteurs au procès de Nuremberg". International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique. doi:10.1007/s11196-021-09834-w.
• Burchard, Christoph (2006). "The Nuremberg Trial and its Impact on Germany". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 4 (4): 800–829. doi:10.1093/jicj/mql052.
• Jockusch, Laura (2012). "Justice at Nuremberg? Jewish Responses to Nazi War-Crime Trials in Allied-Occupied Germany". Jewish Social Studies. 19 (1): 107–147. doi:10.2979/jewisocistud.19.1.107.
• Bloxham, Donald (2013). "From the International Military Tribunal to the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings: The American Confrontation with Nazi Criminality Revisited: International Military Tribunal". History. 98 (332): 567–591. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12024.
• [1]

No access

• Pratt, Valéry (2018). Nuremberg, les droits de l'homme, le cosmopolitisme: pour une philosophie du droit international (in French). Le Bord de l'eau. ISBN 978-2-35687-400-9.
• Seliger, Hubert (2016). Politische Anwälte?: die Verteidiger der Nürnberger Prozesse (in German). Nomos. ISBN 978-3-8487-2360-7.
• Tisseron, Antonin (2014). La France et le procès de Nuremberg: inventer le droit international (in French). Prairies ordinaires. ISBN 978-2-35096-095-1.

I dont think this is near obvious or major enough to warrant a tag in the article, and Im certainly not an experienced enough editor to make a full claim of bias here, but while reading the section on the prosecutions and defences I couldnt help but feel like their structure and wording lightly (that is to say, quite subtly) favors the defence and guides the reader towards believing the defence was treated unfairly. I was hoping a more experienced editor could take a look and give their thoughts. Googleguy007 (talk) 12:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Googleguy007 specifically what in the article is leading you to this conclusion? (t · c) buidhe 13:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that Hartley Shawcross gave an opening speech on the 12th of December: "The British prosecution covered the charge of crimes against peace, [...] On 12 December, Shawcross gave the opening speech..." in the 'American and British Prosecution' section of 'Course of the trial'. However, the Avalon Project's transcript of the trials (linked in the article itself) lists Shawcross's speech as having taken place on the 4th of December instead (https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imtproc_v3menu.asp). At least one other source found online supports this date (the webpage of Rober H. Jackson Center - https://www.roberthjackson.org/nuremberg-event/british-opening-statement-2/). As the other dates in the article appear to line up with Avalon Project, this may be a mistake caused by the fact that 4th of December was the twelfth day of the trials. Jko.366 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Subsequent Nuremburg Trials into Nuremburg trials. I think that since most of the content of the quite short Subsequent Nuremberg Trials article already exists under the heading: "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" in the article of Nuremberg Trials, a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Nuremberg Trials, and would in fact enhance the main article, which is notably more popular between the two. ShoBDin (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose adding more content about the subsequent trials to this article would be UNDUE. (t · c) buidhe 17:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]