Contents

Talk:Nut rage incident

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

A fact from Nut rage incident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that controversy arose over dissatisfaction with a Korean airline official's nut bag? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Macadamia nuts controversy.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Accidents This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ntdb.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: MovedtoNut rage incident. No such user (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Macadamia nuts controversy → Nut rage – The incident is known as Nut rage in the foreign press. No one will find it in the news under Macadamia nuts controversy. Can we move the page back to that title? Yoninah (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support move. Yoninah (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support +{{subst:Requested move}}— Revi 14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per COMMONNAME - "Macadamia nuts controversy" brings in a mere 89,500 results where as "Nur rage" brings in 16,900,000 results so I assume the latter is far more known than the former. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 15:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support in principle, but suggest alternative candidate names "Nut rage incident" or "Nut rate controversy", since the article is not about a general rage phenomenon relating to nuts (e.g., as contrasted with Road rage). —BarrelProof (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with BarrelProof's suggestion; "incident" sounds more neutral for Wikipedia purposes. Yoninah (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Seconded – BarrelProof's suggestions are better. --IJBall (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support move to Nut rage incident, BarrelProof's reasoning is valid, this is not like "road rage". And incident is definitely preferable to controversy.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

http://flightclub.jalopnik.com/korean-air-to-be-sanctioned-for-nut-rage-nepotism-fiasc-1672629452 tells of reported throwing of something and pushing. 211.225.34.166 (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I used your link to write in one of the controversy sections. HanSangYoon (talk) 03:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BLP1E, there is not enough material here to build a standalone biography. I suggest merging the one actual biographical paragraph and redirecting to Nut rage incident. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objections for more than two weeks, merged and redirected. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are any editors interested to bring this article to GA status? sst✈^discuss 16:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lede says crew chief was forced to kneel; text says it was the flight attendant. Nowhere is it said whether it was both that had to kneel before Cho; therefore, something is sorely amiss. XavierItzm (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there's been some more related coverage here. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as Heather Cho redirects here. This would be the place to add it. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why on earth is this picture used here... There is no reference to macadamia nuts, just to nuts, and she didn't even want them in a bowl. The image adds nothing to the article. As its description says, it's just a picture of "macadamia nuts in a bowl". The image should be deleted. Ikjbagl (talk) 22:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops- I missed that it actually was about macadamia nuts... The image still really adds nothing. Ikjbagl (talk) 22:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the image is a bit "gratuitous". - Ahunt (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]