Contents

Talk:Open-source film

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Boy Who Never Slept's license is by-nc-sa, so it's not free. Gallaecio (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• [1] --Gallaecio (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The opening line states: "Open source films (also known as open content films and...". But there is an article on open content film, should these two be merged? ... (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Either merge it or remove one list. Two lists are stupid, one is always incomplete. Thanks. 92.39.27.199 (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

link to Jathia's Wager or to the movie's download and sources is nowhere to be found under that URL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.78.141 (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the real reason these films are interesting is the license. The best way to describe these to people is with the phrase "Open licensed". I'd like to suggest a better name for this list is "Open licensed film". 208.72.192.2 (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

just what is there about "open source" that isn't strictly to do with the license? 216.138.75.50 (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Open source film → Open-source film –

Per WP:HYPHEN. While some sources drop the hyphen, this is common among field professionals and in advertising. Here, the hyphen is necessary for non-experts, as well as being prescribed by the major US and UK style guides. In many places, the absence of the hyphen is ambiguous. Tony (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, assuming my fix to your typo is OK. Dicklyon (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing, Dick. Tony (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. For a general audience such as Wikipedia's the term is ambiguous without the hyphen. —  AjaxSmack  04:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Does The Forbidden Education fit in this article ? Astirmays (talk) 20:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]