Contents

Talk:Operation Pipe Dreams

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Cannabis Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Drug Policy (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles

Untitled

[edit]

I was squinting my eyes, when I saw this. Land of Freedom, yeah, right.

Just a thought: If a law makes lawbreakers out of 50 % of a population, who do you think is wrong: the law or the people?

One of the references in this article wasn't a reference, but just more info. The source was never cited. I moved the additional information back into the article and asked for reference. Hope its true as it would help to exonerate Chong for this, but we need the reference, please. KyNephi (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The authorities appear in a very bad light. I'm surprised that I do not see the word 'entrapment' used at all in the article. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 06:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence fragment "pressured Paris Chong to sell them his pipes and deliver them through the mail" is a hyperlink to the entrapment article, perhaps something more transparent is needed? DavesPlanet (talk) 12:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"was the code-name for a U.S. nationwide investigation in 2003 targeting businesses selling drug paraphernalia"

only one man was put in prison... one, and you didnt need an investigation to know what he (or his son) was up to

so yea, there was no investigation, and it wasnt targetting businesses — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.116.69.101 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]