 | A news item involving Operation Rah-e-Nijat was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 October 2009. |  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can we better define the word "integrist" on this page? The attached link refers to the Papacy and the French Revolution - hardly what I think the Islamic militants are. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will updated the map if I find a wiki compatible liced map. --yousaf465' 07:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why include the US as a beligerent? 124.171.219.128 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
there's probably a good reason that i'm not seeing for omiting this information, but shouldnt the infobox for this page display the start date of the start of the Pakistani ground operation in addition to the date when the operation formally commenced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.60.56 (talk) 22:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to have been written at the start of operations, and not updated since. Seeing as it has been two years, we could probably afford to update the text-changing the future tense to past, including info on how effective the offensive was, rather than how effective it was predicted to be, etc. I'm also going to fix references to Osama bin Laden possibly being in South Waziristan, since recent events have proven this assumption false. The article will now make references to the fact that it was believed at the time that OBL was in the region. Dpenn89 (talk) 06:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that most of the first section appears copy-pasted from the TIME article listed as a reference. This is copyrighted material, and should be reworded to avoid complications.
Second, I did some cleanup work on the rest of the article, making it reflect something that has already happened, and eliminating the POV use of the word "martyred" to describe fallen soldiers. This eliminates a possibly contentions wording on a matter of faith, and simplifies the article's sentence structure.
I see room for updating this article with more recent reporting on the outcome of operations-surely some more progress has been made since last October? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpenn89 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some units, such as the "50th Airborne division" and "10th Special Forces Battalion", do not exist and aren't name in any of the sources mentioned. They should be removed. 2A02:C7C:D45B:2C00:E0FE:1B55:E727:88AF (talk) 03:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
