Contents

Talk:Orthoclase

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Mid‑importance Talk:Orthoclase is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage. Rocks and minerals Mid‑importance Orthoclase is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Images?

[edit]

What the heck. This article does not have a single image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drahcir (talk • contribs)

Uh, yes it does. Sign your comments. oTHErONE 06:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We might want to merge this info with the Template:Infobox_mineral. 130.39.191.251 (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did it - doesn't have all the right categories - I should look into that sometime. Awickert (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure whether this wiki should use US english.86.162.162.106 (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is perfectly valid to use either US or British spelling, but not both together. In this case, the article seems written in US spelling. Another rule is the "major contributor" may choose the spelling, meaning if the article was started in one spelling, it may be kept in that spelling by all means (but may also be changed upon agreement with the starting editor). Materialscientist (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And that would be me - back in '05. Color it is. Cheers :-) Vsmith (talk) 00:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]