Contents

Talk:Oxford shoe

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photographs[edit]

A collection of photographs should be added, demonstrating exactly what is meant by an Oxford shoe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andorin (talk • contribs) 16:06, 2007 December 28 (UTC)

"made of untanned leather?" how can this be? if it is leather, it has been tanned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.42.58 (talk) 01:21, 2006 August 7 (UTC)

Perhaps you should mentioned also that we call Oxford shoes, "Richelieu" also. In France, this is the term adequate to describe these types of shoes. (LaraJaneL (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

From "A tempered wind":

We had to have a young lady assistant to help us work this graft; and I asked Buck if he knew of one to fill the bill.

"One," says I, "that is cool and wise and strictly business from her pompadour to her Oxfords. No ex-toe-dancers or gum-chewers or crayon portrait canvassers for this."

Do Oxfords = Oxford shoes here? A redirect "Oxfords"->"Oxford shoes" could be made then. CopperKettle (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found them at Wiktionary; will redirect. CopperKettle (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in the U.S., Balmoral is synonymous with Oxford, and is the more generally used name

Balmoral is the more generally used name in the US? I live in the US and I've never heard the term, whereas Oxfords is quite common. You could check out a few online US-based shoe stores and see that many will have sections for Oxfords, but for Balmorals? Not so much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.221.34 (talk) 06:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Here in the U.S. the term "Oxfords" is different that described in Wikipedia. --Daringest (talk) 02:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it also should be mentioned that brown or black Oxfords are part of a British Army officers barrack and service dress? --Panzer71 (talk) 20:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[...]in the U.S., "Balmoral" is synonymous with "Oxford", while "Oxford" is often used to refer to any "dressy" style of shoe, [...]

The terms Balmoral, Derby and Blucher are hardly used here in the U.S. Oxford is used to refer to a low shoe (not 3/4 height or boot) with laces over the instep. Not all "dressy" styles of shoes are called an Oxford, because slip-on shoes and loafers aren't oxfords. And, not only "dressy" styles of shoes are called Oxfords because low-top lace-up sneakers(athletic shoes) are also called Oxfords. The shoe styles Oxford, Derby, Blucher etc. described in Wikipedia articles seem to be British definitions and very different to American definitions. --Daringest (talk) 02:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, here in the U.S., "oxford" and "derby" mean exactly what Wikipedia says they mean (i.e. closed lacing vs. open lacing, respectively); the problem is that few Americans understand the difference, and retailers freely use the term "oxford," even when it's inaccurate, presumably because they know that people will shell out more $ for it. I once criticized Allen Edmonds (one of the most prominent American shoe companies) for selling a derby on Amazon and calling it an oxford. I was voted down repeatedly by people who didn't have the foggiest idea of what I was talking about.--72.94.172.49 (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This term smacks of homophobia to me. I'm not 100% though, so I'm throwing it out there rather than editing. Ride the Hurricane (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oxford shoe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140309172314/http://womensoxfordshoes.org/womens-oxford-shoes-2/tohttps://womensoxfordshoes.org/womens-oxford-shoes-2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the German article links to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balmoral_(Schuh) , an article on a shoe model that is, as far as I can tell, unrelated. In my opinion it should instead link to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_(Schuh). --2A00:8A60:E00E:1138:B896:F01E:CA8F:8CF1 (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

قیمت کفش اکسفوردمشکی 2.147.253.61 (talk) 08:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If an Oxford shoe is particularly characterised by closed lacing, with the lace eyelet under the leather, why is a shoe with the eyelet on top of the leather used as an example? Should we look for another picture? 90.205.22.33 (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]